This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome In 2–3 pages, address the following:
• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.
|
15 to >13.0 pts Excellent The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. |
13 to >11.0 pts Good The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. |
11 to >10.0 pts Fair The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. |
10 to >0 pts Poor The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing. |
15 pts
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome In 2–3 pages, address the following: • Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.
|
|
15 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome • Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
|
|
25 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome • Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
|
|